Breadcrumbs navigation
The global architecture of disappearances: Unifying a fragmented field
Iosif Kovras discusses the key points from their new Review of International Studies article written with co-authors Nikandros Ioannidis, Constantinos Djouvas and Christos J Christodoulou - The global architecture of disappearances: Unifying a fragmented field
Want to know more? You can read the full article at DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210526102034
This is an Open Access article but BISA members receive access to RIS (and to our other journal European Journal of International Security) as a benefit of membership. To gain access, log in to your BISA account and scroll down to the 'Membership benefits' section. If you're not yet a member join today.
Abstract
Disappearances are used by states, insurgents, militias, criminal groups, and transnational security services, yet international studies lack a shared framework for systematically comparing them across contexts. Despite their relevance to repression, civil conflict, criminal governance, and migration, they remain theoretically fragmented and empirically under-measured, examined across partially overlapping literatures employing distinct definitions and case-bound approaches. This article introduces the first global, systematically coded database of disappearances (1999–2023) and a purpose-based typology identifying nine strategic logics underpinning the practice, ranging from state repression and counterinsurgency to criminal extraction, trafficking, and identity-based targeting. The typology reveals shared rationales across political and criminal domains, while the dataset traces how disappearance practices diffuse, evolve, and adapt over time. By reconceptualizing disappearances as an adaptive form of coercion operating under conditions of heightened external scrutiny, the article contributes to international studies debates on repression, sovereignty, and the governance of violence.
Photo by Juliana Kozoski on Unsplash