close up shot of a Filipino flag waving above a street

Neocolonial decoloniality?: Ontological (in)security and the Pantayong Pananaw master fantasy

This article was written by Michael Magcamit
This article was published on

Michael Magcamit discusses the key points from his new Review of International Studies article - Neocolonial decoloniality?: Ontological (in)security and the Pantayong Pananaw master fantasy

 

Want to know more? You can read the full article at DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210526102083

This is an Open Access article but BISA members receive access to RIS (and to our other journal European Journal of International Security) as a benefit of membership. To gain access, log in to your BISA account and scroll down to the 'Membership benefits' section. If you're not yet a member join today.

Abstract

This paper develops ontological security theorizing beyond its Eurocentric focus by probing the Filipino pantayong pananaw (from-us-for-us perspective) movement as a potentially decolonial intellectual and political framework. Drawing on Lacanian theorization of ontological security, I argue that pantayong pananaw can be thought of as a master fantasy that guides the desire for and quest by a formerly colonized group to become coherent, complete, and indivisible Filipinos. Amidst the inescapable ontological lack and anxiety deeply entwined with their colonial experience, the pantayong pananaw fantasy operates as a protective mechanism that promises a resolution to an original deadlock: the absence of Filipinoness. Owing to its inherently Self-versus-Other orientation, however, the pantayong pananaw fantasy inevitably imposes a closure based on a singular version of social reality aligned with an idealized vision of the Filipino identity, homeland, and nation-state. The result is neocolonial decoloniality, that is, a condition where the pursuit of intellectual and political decoloniality paradoxically creates and entrenches existing (neo)colonial structures and arrangements that perpetually marginalize certain groups within a postcolonial society. Such a dilemma has significant implications for the ethos and practice of decoloniality both as an intellectual and a political project.

Photo by iSawRed on Unsplash