overhead shot of a globe

‘In the West but not of the West’: Notes on Wittgenstein, dialogue, and decoloniality

Garrett FitzGerald

Garrett FitzGerald discusses the key points from his new Review of International Studies article - ‘In the West but not of the West’: Notes on Wittgenstein, dialogue, and decoloniality

Want to know more? You can read the full article at DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210526102101

This is not an Open Access article but BISA members receive access to RIS (and to our other journal European Journal of International Security) as a benefit of membership. To gain access, log in to your BISA account and scroll down to the 'Membership benefits' section. If you're not yet a member join today.

Abstract

The ‘relational turn’ in International Studies offers an important opportunity for the field to move beyond Eurocentric conceptions of relationality in the study of international politics. But pluralizing sources for relational thinking requires practical negotiation of epistemic, ontological, and cosmological differences for which the field remains poorly equipped. To address the methodological needs around navigating relational differences, this article rereads the philosophical method of Ludwig Wittgenstein alongside key insights from decolonial theory to provide a conceptual and practical bridge between Westernized approaches to International Studies and the diverse relationalities at play in non-Westernized ways of knowing and being. Scholars of International Studies and decolonial theory highlight Wittgenstein’s utility for deconstructing epistemic and ontological Eurocentrism. However, this article introduces for the first time the important practical, epistemic, and ethical consonances between Wittgenstein’s method of dialogical comparison and decolonial practices of pluriversal dialogue around specific ‘connectors’, seemingly cognate concepts whose irreducible plurality of meaning provides grounds for contingent practices of pluriversal encounter. Through its family resemblances to pluriversal dialogue, Wittgenstein’s method re-envisions the field’s key concepts as sites for discursive encounter across epistemic, ontological, and cosmological differences, opening possibilities for engagement with correspondingly diverse modes of relationality.

Read the full article on the Review of International Studies website
Log into your BISA account (to gain access to articles as part of your membership)
Find out more about Review of International Studies