Whose age of anxiety? Provincialising ontological insecurity
In this short video extract, Alistair Mark discusses his key arguments from his new Review of International Studies article - Whose age of anxiety? Provincialising ontological insecurity
Want to know more? You can read the full article at DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210525100909
This is an open access article, however BISA members receive access to RIS (and to our other journal European Journal of International Security) as a benefit of membership. To gain access, log in to your BISA account and scroll down to the 'Membership benefits' section. If you're not yet a member join today.
Abstract
Background
The ‘Age of Anxiety’ has emerged as a common narrative trope in International Relations scholarship, particularly within the sub-field of ontological security studies. This narrative frames recent global crises – such as climate change, COVID-19, and declining Western-liberal hegemony – as ushering in a new era of existential uncertainty. The article critiques the universality of this thesis, arguing that it overgeneralises from the Western-liberal experience and neglects spatial and temporal diversity in the global experience of anxiety.
Methods
The article employs a critical-interpretivist methodology, drawing on postcolonial theory, the history of emotions, and ontological security studies. It draws on illustrative examples to interrogate the spatial and temporal assumptions underpinning the Age of Anxiety thesis.
Results
The article shows how the Age of Anxiety thesis reproduces Eurocentric periodisations, presenting the affective experiences of the liberal-Western lifeworld as universal, thereby marginalising subaltern experiences of anxiety. The article also identifies significant spatial and demographic variation in the circulation of anxiety, such as the uneven distribution of climate anxiety, and introduces the concept of postcolonial anxiety to foreground longue durée, haunting forms of insecurity that elude Western-centric framings.
Conclusion
The article concludes by calling for a pluriversal approach to ontological security that recognises diverse emotional communities and alternative temporalities through which anxiety can be experienced. It urges scholars to adopt more reflexive, empirically grounded, and historically sensitive analyses that decentre the Western-liberal subject.
