(Un)desirable women: The production of the ideal Women, Peace and Security agenda participant in Myanmar
Rebecca Haines discusses the key points from her new co-authored with Elisabeth Olivius, Khin Khin Mra and Jenny Hedström Review of International Studies article - (Un)desirable women: The production of the ideal Women, Peace and Security agenda participant in Myanmar
Want to know more? You can read the full article at DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210526101971
This is an Open Access article, however BISA members receive access to RIS (and to our other journal European Journal of International Security) as a benefit of membership. To gain access, log in to your BISA account and scroll down to the 'Membership benefits' section. If you're not yet a member join today.
Abstract
International actors working to implement the UN’s Women, Peace and Security (WPS) agenda emphasize the importance of partnership with local women’s organizations and activists. Building on data from Myanmar, this study examines how and when women in conflict contexts are understood as ideal participants in – and vehicles for – the WPS agenda. Drawing on interviews with international donors, gender experts, and Myanmar women activists, the analysis demonstrates how both desirable and undesirable participant subject positions are produced through the discourses and funding choices of WPS donors. In particular, we identify and discuss three undesirable subject positions prominent in donor-driven discourses: the oppositional woman, the fearful woman, and the apolitical woman. We also find that how (un)desirability is framed depends on changing factors that include shifts in local political context and in the foreign policy goals of international donors – shifts that may be particularly dramatic and abrupt in conflict-affected contexts. Critically examining the production of these three undesirable subject positions, we discuss what kinds of local women can be recognized as desirable participants in the implementation of the WPS agenda and draw attention to persistent power relations that shape political space and inclusion in peacebuilding.
